Personal information protection law is to put "security lock"

On November 1, "Personal Information Protection Law" officially landed. As a law specializing in personal information protection, the law has a series of social systems to improve personal information and sensitive personal information processing rules, and report work mechanisms to improve their personal information and sensitive personal information processing rules. The hot problem of concern is a "safety lock" of a personal information protection. With the continuous integration of informationization and economic and social development, the collection and use of all kinds of personal information is more extensive, and it is more frequent.

But at the same time, personal privacy is excessively collected, and the problem of illegal use of illegal disclosure is also suffering.

Former foot browsing the real estate information, after receiving the sales phone; registering the member, selling text messages) to the sky; search for a item, frequently received similar product advertising … In addition to the website, the APP has no well-informed "precision marketing", there is a criminal classification price Pulling the ID card number, the express list, etc. How to better protect personal information, be more urgent questions. In fact, from the "Criminal Law Amendment (Nine)" to add the crime of infringing citizens, to the "Network Safety Law", then to the "Civil Code", these years, my country’s personal information protection legal system is gradually established and Constantly developing and improvement

However, due to lack of special law, many consumers suffer from privacy leaks, but I don’t know how to seek legal relief.

In this sense, the barrier of personal information security is built, the key one is to enhance the targeted, authoritative and systematicism of legal norms.

The introduction of "Personal Information Protection Law" not only effectively makes up for legal vulnerabilities, but also forward-looking regulations on issues brought about new technology.

For example, for the network platform "Big Data Kill", this method clearly "does not implement unreasonable differences on trading conditions such as trading prices".

In response to the problem of "a package authorization", "a package authorization", "a package authorization", which "a package authorization", which is strongly reflected, "Does not agree to deal with personal information or withdraw agreed by, refuse to provide products or services". In response to the "brush face" issue of people’s most concerned public places, the law can only be "necessary to maintain public safety". These highly targeted provisions fully reflect the leadership and promotion of legislation to regulate market order, encourage Internet platform-benign competition, and deliver balance between convenient life and privacy protection. In addition, the "Personal Information Protection Law" is also exhaustive and systematic provisions in sensitive personal information, national organs to handle personal information, personal information cross-borders, personal rights, personal information handler’s obligations. From the perspective of modern rule of law, the implementation of the "Personal Information Protection Law" has been seamlessly connected to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code, which makes people’s daily lives about the "Rule of Law" protected by personal information. More security and happiness. This is the priority reference element established by the new law, but also adheres to the social rule of law of "illegal must be based".

"Act is not enough to be self", the law of the law is in the implementation.

There is a first step in the first step of building a security border, which is only built in the first step, and then inventory is also inseparable from supervision, and the company is jointly promoted by many levels of users.

All parties work together, strictly challenge, and build an Internet platform regulatory system that meets the modern management methods, and promotes good governance of good laws into reality.

Deputy Director of the Rule of Law Communication Research Center of China University of Political Science and Law.